WWJS Challenges Chuck O’Neal to a Public Debate

For some reason, Chuck O’Neal doesn’t understand that WWJS, being a part of the Minerva Coalition, has decades of academic debate experience behind it. So he decides to accuse us of being “anonymous, flippant, cowards” (not sure why he needs that extra comma):

Picture 1

But WWJS is totally ok with being public, serious, and outspoken. (How did he miss that fact?) So we have issued a challenge:

Picture 2

Text is:

Dear Chuck,

I know you are getting desperate at this point. That’s obvious since you call us at WWJS “anonymous, flippant, cowards.”

Fact is, we are not cowards. In fact, I’d like to challenge you to a public debate on God Discussion. If you yourself are not a coward, would you like to participate?

Let me know,

WWJS

This, of course, presupposes that God Discussion would be interested in hosting such a debate. But we at Minerva Coalition are pretty sure they’d be down.

Ball is now in Chuck O’Neal’s court. If he wants to take on rhetoricians who have decades of public speaking, academic debate, and social media experience, we are more than happy to oblige. Child abuse is not to be taken lightly.

Update: We take it one step further:

Picture 5

Advertisements

One comment

  1. […] is also after he accused us at WWJS of being “anonymous, flippant, cowards.” Yet when we challenged him to a public debate, he was apparently too scared to respond. (He has yet to […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: